700,000 coastal properties in Australia are in danger
MORE than 80,000 coastal buildings in Victoria are at risk and large parts of Western Port are likely to be swamped as climate change triggers rising seas, floods and erosion, a report to Federal Parliament has warned.
An 18-month investigation by a House of Representatives committee, backed by members of both major parties, warns the Government that the ”time to act is now” to prepare thousands of kilometres of Australian coastline for the threat of sea-level rise and extreme weather.
Proposals include improving evacuation routes for coastal communities and introducing early warning systems for coastal areas.
In Victoria, the most consistent threat is at Western Port, with nearly one-fifth of the region south-east of Melbourne likely to be inundated, damaging the environment and infrastructure.
About 18,000 Western Port properties valued at nearly $2 billion are considered vulnerable to flood.
Nationwide, more than 700,000 coastal properties with a combined worth of about $150 billion are potentially at risk, the report finds.
In parts of northern Australia, it warns, coastal communities will also become more vulnerable to insect-borne disease, and the celebrated Kakadu National Park’s freshwater wetlands faces being flooded with saltwater.
The report by the Standing Committee on Climate Change, Water, Environment and the Arts, calls on Canberra to boost its role in preparing coastal communities for the threats, working with states and local governments. Its recommendations include:
The report calls for the Australian Emergency Management Committee to be charged with improving access and evacuation routes for coastal communities. It compares the potential risks they face to those experienced by people fleeing this year’s Black Saturday bushfires in Victoria.
”Evacuation routes were a significant contributing factor to the extent of the tragedy,” the report says. ”A reliable evacuation route is vital in a disaster management strategy.
”It is therefore imperative that evacuation routes and methods be examined when developing community emergency responses.”







